Strong "Bond" With THE GOOD WIFE

Article originally published as THE GOOD WIFE Review "Bond" on Seat42F.

THE GOOD WIFE (L-R) Chris Noth as Peter Florrick and Margo Martindale as Ruth Eastman Photo: Paul Sarkis/CBS

In the season premiere of THE GOOD WIFE on CBS, “Bond, “Alicia (Julianna Margulies) struggles to make it on her own as a lawyer, Cary (Matt Czuchry) struggles to connect with the young associates at Lockhart Agos, and Ruth Eastman (Margo Martindale) struggles to handle her candidate’s wife. Oh, and in one of the biggest shakeups ever in a show known for shakeups, that happens.

The that I’m referring to is Peter’s (Chris Noth) betrayal of Eli Gold (Alan Cumming). In a world where Eli found Peter and molded him into what he is today, helping him achieve his dreams, that same Peter turns his back on the campaign manager and cuts him loose. It’s selfish and unfair, and not all that surprising when you think about what we’ve seen of Peter.

But is still feels surprising. Eli and Peter’s partnership is the one that doesn’t waver when everything else does. We’ve seen managing partners at law firms come and go, relationships fall apart, and a variety of people come in and out of the scene. What we’ve never seen is that strong “Bond” between Peter and Eli waver much. And now we not only have, but we’ve witnessed it disintegrate completely in the course of a single hour, leaving Eli bent on revenge against his former boss and best friend.

The fact that Eli essentially gives up and shuts down is understandable. His pain is felt in Cumming’s brilliant performance, and it makes sense for Eli to be thrown by this. His lamenting about being ‘the help’ is not accurate, but one can easily understand how he feels that way in the face of Peter’s chill. Thankfully, Eli is not a man that can be kept down, and with some support from Alicia, soon has a strategy to get back in the game.

Some might wonder why Alicia is so loyal to Eli. For those regular viewers, though, it shouldn’t be a mystery. Alicia is a loyal person, by and large, only betraying when she has to, and after being given good reason to do so. She didn’t like Eli at first, perhaps, but she has learned to respect him, as he has her. They have a great working relationship, and dare I say it, even an odd kind of friendship. That Alicia chooses to stand by Eli reinforces the “Bond” they share and rewards those who may have defended Eli in the past.

What Eli’s plan is, I have no idea, but I hope he wins.

That’s not because I don’t like Ruth Eastman. Sure, she’s a slippery political manipulator, but so is he. And I absolutely adore Martindale (The Americans, Justified, The Millers), who delivers her usual excellent performance in this role; the longer it takes Eli to defeat her, that happier I’ll be, and if they should team up to hurt Peter, even better. I just love Eli more, having watched him for years on THE GOOD WIFE, and he must triumph.

Alicia has business challenges, becoming a “Bond” lawyer to make ends meet. She continues to resists Louis Canning’s (Michael J. Fox) overtures, finds a way to work with prickly Judge Schakowsky (Christopher McDonald, Harry’s Law), and even makes a friend who will surely soon be a partner or employee, Lucca Quinn (Cush Jumbo, Getting On, Torchwood: Children of Earth). This plot is enjoyable but not particularly compelling because it’s easy to be confident Alicia will come out on top. What would be fascinating is if she takes Canning up on his offer, which it seems she’s inching closer to doing.

Alicia isn’t the only one with troubles, though, as Cary struggles to connect to the lawyers working under him. Cary is unique in the his firm because he’s the one young person in a group of much older people running the place. He can’t connect with those on his power level because he’s too different, and those that should be his peers are intimidated because he’s their boss. Like Alicia, I feel like Cary will find a way to get through, as he is tenacious, and Lockhart Agos can’t possibly change names again anytime soon. So I liked his sections, but don’t feel much suspense in them.

Those are the main points in “Bond.” I could actually write about ten pages were I to gush about all the wonderful moments, especially those involving guest stars Jane Curtin (Coneheads, Saturday Night Live, 3^rd Rock from the Sun) and Mo Rocca (The Daily Show), among others, and courtroom showdowns, but I won’t. The above paragraphs hit the main points, and there will be plenty of time to talk about THE GOOD WIFE in the weekly columns I’ll write covering the show this year. Suffice it to say, “Bond” is a fantastic episode, and season seven promises to be on par with the first six years, which are overall very strong.

THE GOOD WIFE airs Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on CBS.

Is KIRSTIE Still a Star?

Article first published as Is KIRSTIE Still a Star? on TheTVKing.

TVLand is known for creating new sitcoms that feel dated. They do this by hiring the stars of old shows and putting them in a familiar tone with similar writing. It's not the freshest, most original method of making television, but it tends to satisfy TVLand viewers, who tune in to watch the classics, if Hot in Cleveland's success is any indication.

The latest entry into this genre is Kirstie, which premiered this week with a double episode, "Pilot; Arlo Moves In." As one might expect, the show stars Kirstie Alley (Cheers, Veronica's Closet), though rather than playing a character named after the actress, her role is that of Maddie Banks, a Broadway star. That's kind of strange, considering that the title of the series really has no connection at all to the story or characters. But it should serve to draw fans of Alley in. Make no mistake, her fans are out there, as she can truly act well when she wants to.

In the "Pilot," Arlo Barth (Eric Petersen), whom Maddie gave up for adoption many years ago, finds his biological mother after the woman that raised him dies and quickly insinuates himself into Maddie's life. By the second half hour, "Arlo Moves In," they are sharing an apartment. Arlo is a man-child who is very rough around the edges, but he'll teach Maddie to care as she tries to teach him how to adjust to her world. It'll probably be a slow learning curve in order to preserve the premise as long as possible.

Maddie really doesn't have friends, just employees who she spends her time with, so she has plenty of room in her life for Arlo. One wonders what she did with all her free time pre-Arlo, but Kirstie doesn't dwell on that, sticking to a few, simple routines Arlo can work himself in to, and putting Maddie out of her element just a little bit to provide some fodder in the other direction.

Kirstie is enjoyable, but it's not because of the story. This sitcom is as formulaic as possible, and the situation feels off, especially because there is no notable connection between Maddie and Arlo in temperament nor in looks. The plot is predictable and thin. Growth will be extremely slow, if it ever comes.

But the cast is terrific. Not Petersen, so much, who serves his purpose, but is overshadowed by the veterans surrounding him. Kirstie plays Maddie exactly how so many have though of her over the years - a diva whose talent doesn't quite measure up to the reality. Rhea Perlman, Kirstie's Cheers co-star, joins her as gruff assistant and friend Thelma. Michael Richards, who had his own fall from grace post-Seinfeld, is Kirstie's weird driver, Frank. The three play parts similar to what they're known for playing, and those skills were honed in a couple of the best comedy series ever made. Toss in hilarious, better-be-recurring roles for Kristen Chenoweth (Pushing Daisies, Wicked) as Maddie's understudy and Christopher McDonald (Harry's Law) as her on-stage leading man, and you have an enjoyable program.

Now, is that enough to build an entirely new show on? Not on any other network, surely, but on TVLand, which hangs on to the past, rather than looking to break new ground or create something special in its own right, it just may have a chance. Especially because, flaws included, it's still better than most of its peers on the network.

Kirstie airs Wednesdays at 10 p.m. ET on TVLand.

BODY OF PROOF Examined One Last Time

Article first published as DVD Review: 'Body of Proof - The Complete Third Season' on Blogcritics.

The final season of ABC’s Body of Proof  begins on a sad note, with Dr. Megan Hunt (Dana Delany) just getting back to work after three months off, a break taken following the death of her professional partner, Peter (Nicholas Bishop). To make matter worse, her daughter, Lacey (Mary Mouser), is kidnapped, and a bomb is hidden in a dead body. So Megan’s return is not exactly something to celebrate.

It’s kind of nice, though, to start with a case that will match the current tone of the series. With both Bud (John Carroll Lynch) and Sam (Sonja Sohn) gone from the cast, too, there is a sense of loss and emptiness anyway. By going down such a dramatic, depressing path, it allows the show to match the sadness felt by fans, rather than just trying to pretend that nothing has happened and move on.

Unfortunately, the replacements for those missing characters seem a bit too contrived. I like Mark Valley (Harry’s Law, Boston Legal), but his character of Tommy Sullivan, the new police detective that works with the Medical Examiner’s office, has a past with Megan. Yes, he is more magnetic than Peter, but the two men are far too similar, making every feel like replaceable archetypes. Why must TV shows force past connections? Why not allow new relationships to bloom on their own? Why does Tommy so neatly fill the role that Peter did? There’s both a sense of continuity, and one of overreach, right from the start of the run.

There are some things this third season of Body of Proof does correctly. It allows Megan to delve deeper into her father’s suicide, uncovering a cover up, and find closure. In fact, her story overall ends on a very hopeful note. The ensemble is still intact, with delicious friction between Megan and Kate (Jeri Ryan), and comic relief provided by Ethan (Geoffrey Arend) and Curtis (Windell Middlebrooks). Each member of the cast gets some nice bits of their own this year.

The final thirteen episodes are teeming with fantastic guest and recurring stars. Among those featured in The Complete Third Series are Henry Ian Cusick (Lost), Alan Dale (also Lost), Luke Perry, Joanna Cassidy, Richard Burgi (Desperate Housewives), Lorraine Toussaint (Saving Grace), Marissa Ramirez (Blue Bloods), Annie Wersching (24), Christopher McDonald (Harry’s Law), and Sharon Lawrence (NYPD Blue).

Of course, bringing in that kind of roster, especially while struggling to stay on the air, does seem a bit gimmicky. And the biggest issue with the show, that it concentrates too much on the case of the week, rather than the soapy drama between the characters, which is the bread and butter of most ABC series, is not overcome. But as far as procedurals go, this one is better than many.

Now that it’s canceled, Body of Proof will be missed, most especially because Dana Delany deserves to be on screen. She is a wonderful actress who can draw an audience, a fact proven in the multiple shows she has starred in. At least we have The Complete Third Season on DVD to rewatch and enjoy, as these are pretty solid installments, especially the series finale. Hopefully, she’ll be back before you know it.

This three-disc set has five bonus features, including an amusing gag reel. Other offerings include featurettes on the look of the production, the importance of props, a set tour, and the visual effects that make Los Angeles look like Philadelphia. It’s an appropriate amount of extras for the size of the release, and while none are super memorable, they do fit with what is presented.

Body of Proof The Complete Third Season is available now.

Happy Endings Visited By "Brothas & Sisters"

Article first published as Happy Endings Visited By "Brothas & Sisters" on TheTVKing.

ABC's Happy Endings completes its third season with "Brothas & Sisters." The gang attends the wedding of the eldest Kerkovich sister, the unseen-before-now Brooke (Stephanie March, Law & Order: SVU). Hijinks ensue as sibling rivalry rears its ugly head, and rumors spread like wildfire, whether they are true or not.

Now that we've met the entire Kerkovich clan, I'm not sure I'm satisfied with the casting. Jane (Eliza Coupe) and Alex (Elisha Cuthbert) are great, but their chemistry with Brooke is cold and stilted. Part of this could be because Brooke has such an off-putting personality in the first place, but it just doesn't feel like she has the same sister bond with them as they do with each other, which is disappointing. It's also understandable, given she isn't around, and yet still seems off.

Their parents (Harry's Law's Christopher McDonald and Airplane's Julie Hagerty) also don't gel with their daughters. It makes one wonder how Jane is as put together as she is, given such flighty parents. Alex's personality, on the other hand, makes sense.

That being said, it is fun to see Jane struggle to please someone who is unpleasable, like Brooke is. The characters say early in the half hour that when Brooke appears, Jane reverts to Alex and Alex stays the baby. I disagree with that assertion. Jane never gets dumb and silly, she just gets clumsy and frazzled. She's a whole different kind of mess than Alex is, and it's a new side of Jane we've yet to see, which makes it surprising and fresh.

Penny (Casey Wilson) is just as thrown off her game as Jane by Brooke, who continuously pretends she doesn't know Penny, though they have met many times. However, this is nothing new for Penny, who is rarely on her game, and so while amusing, it isn't quite as exciting as seeing Jane act that way.

I really like the dynamic between Brad (Damon Wayans Jr.) and his new brother-in-law, Elliot (James Lesure, Las Vegas). Though not really similar people, Elliot brings out both insecurity and kinship in Brad simultaneously as they try to relate to one another. It's a fine line that Wayans walks in his handling of the role in "Brothas & Sisters," yet he succeeds in creating a new relationship that I hope is explored further on Happy Endings in the future.

Penny and Max (Adam Pally) can't keep their mouths shut at the wedding, spilling the beans to many attendees that Alex and Dave (Zachary Knighton) have broken up. They then try to cover themselves by making up other lies. What results is a very large comedy of errors, combining with Jane's screw ups to disastrously ruin the ceremony.

All of this is too much. Happy Endings skews cartoonish from time to time, but "Brothas & Sisters" takes this to an extreme. I wonder if part of the failing of this episode is its attempt to include guest stars in a meaningful way. I find the series is best when concentrating on the main group. However, even a weak episode of Happy Endings, which I consider this season finale to be, compared to other outings, is still more entertaining than most sitcoms, given the excellent chemistry among the core cast, and it still earns laughs.

It's depressing that Alex and Dave break up, though. Their reasons are solid, that they've never really been with other people, and they're not sure they should be together, romantically. Yet, just getting them back together this year, after witnessing their falling out in the series premiere, it's sad to think their relationship is over again. Hopefully, this is temporary.

Happy Endings has not been renewed for a fourth season, and that's why the hanging Dave/Alex plot, as well as Penny's unresolved crush on Dave from last year, makes me uneasy. I do hope they get to come back, whether on ABC, TBS, or somewhere else, as it's a show I always look forward to watching, and there are easily many more stories to tell about this group of people.

Harry's Law is the only law

NBC's Harry's Law ends its hiatus last night with "After the Lovin'." Adam (Nathan Corddry) and Harry (Kathy Bates) disagree over the morality of taking a settlement from Harry's former firm after her old colleague, Sam (Christian Clemenson, Boston Legal, CSI: Miami), gets a nail in the head. Tommy (Christopher McDonald) is also accused of being immoral when a girlfriend finds out he is seeing other women, and sues him over it. And Cassie (Karen Olivo) tries to help a friend whose ex-husband (Jay Harrington, Better Off Ted, Private Practice, in a chillingly awesome performance) seems threatening.

Morality is something that can be subjective, and Harry's Law loves to play in the gray areas. Harry does what she thinks is right, even if that crosses the boundaries of what is known to be legal. Adam tends to follow the letter of the law more carefully. But in "After the Lovin'," the letter of the law isn't clear. They cannot accept the settlement if Sam is not in his right mind. But is Sam sane? Traumatic events can put one's priorities in order. Does Sam agree to cutting a large check because his brain is injured, which the doctors deny, or because he has a change of heart?

To be completely fair, should Sam ever come to his senses and press charges, any judge is likely to side with Adam here. Given Sam's abrupt about face post-accident, it only makes sense that caution should be taken in this situation. Yet, Harry has a point about the evil of cigarette corporations, and wanting to get money out of them. Though her judgment is clouded because Sam works for Harry's old firm, which kicked her to the curb. But even setting that aside, Harry's client (Brent Jennings, Moneyball) deserves the money for losing his wife to addiction to the unhealthy product.

Seeing Adam and Harry at odds in "After the Lovin'" is actually a great development. Harry clearly has a motherly instinct for Adam, and Adam is hurt by Harry's questionable actions because of the high respect that he has for her. Harry threatening to fire Adam may have gone a little too far, but everyone says things that they don't mean when they are upset. Their business relationship is fundamentally stable, even if they disagree. It's great that they are there to keep each other in line when a line is in danger of being crossed.

Clemenson is fantastic in the regrettably small role of Sam. A veteran of creator David E. Kelley's former series, Boston Legal, Clemenson brings the same level of talent he consistently showed in his Emmy-winning performance, now with a different character. There are similarities between Sam and Jerry, to be sure, but there are also differences. Sam is more toned down, and less quirky. It's wonderful to see him again in any capacity, and hopefully Clemenson will return to the show soon.

The opening of Harry's Law, when Sam almost breaks the fourth wall at the beginning of "After the Lovin'," is absolutely fantastic. The fourth wall was frequently torn down on BL, though HL has a somewhat different tone. The scene brings to mind a memorable occurrence when Jerry sang the Boston Legal theme song, though, sadly, Harry's Law does not have a full theme for him to perform. Terrific reference for Kelley fans.

So Tommy is in trouble again in "After the Lovin'." And, at first glance, it seems that it's just his womanizing ways leading him astray. The latest victim? A girl he has been seeing for months (Melinda McGraw, Men of a Certain Age, Mad Men, The Dark Knight), who learns that they aren't exclusive. She is understandably upset, and perhaps thinks of taking legal action because she has been dating a lawyer and has court on the brain. Of course, this is an overreaction, and she drops the suit. But it shows the level of pain that she is feeling.

Tommy is far from blameless, of course. He acts dishonestly and without regard for her feelings. However, as is the case in other areas of Tommy's life, his being a player is a defensive mechanism for his insecurities. Tommy is afraid of being alone, and so keeps backups. He does love this woman, but is afraid that she will abandon him. Is it too late for him to make a real go of a relationship with her if he commits to sincerity and drops the act? Let's hope not. He should be happy. She seems like a warm person who may entertain a second chance, and Tommy needs lots of those.

Tommy's actions are not exactly defended by Oliver (Mark Valley), whom Tommy asks to represent him in "After the Lovin'," but still earns Oliver disgusted glances from Chunhua (Irene Keng) anyway. What did Oliver do to her? There has got to be more to this story than has been shown on screen, and it's important for both of these characters that the viewers are let in on that.

Cassie has a very tough case. Her friend (Emily Maya Mills) is scared, but there isn't any proof to justify a restraining order. Judge Beckland (Derek Webster) would like to help, but there's just no basis for him to do so. Add to that, the ex's counsel (Omar Metwally) believes his client is a good guy, and Cassie has no case. In fact, as "After the Lovin'" goes on, Cassie's friend seems paranoid, and viewers might be forgiven for thinking that she is trying to set her ex up. And in trying to protect herself, Cassie further hurts her client's standing.

Which reveals a glaring hole in our legal system, without offering a way to fix it. This is something that Harry's Law does plenty, but when the safety and well being of a child are on the line, it is even more disturbing than usual. Without the ex acting against the mother of his child, there is nothing anyone can do. But once he acts, it could be too late.

This is 'solved' in "After the Lovin'" by Cassie's friend's kid (Izabela Vidovic) loading a gun that her mother leaves pointed at the door. The ex comes by in the middle of the night and is killed. He is no longer a threat, but the cold way that the child seems completely unaffected by her actions is even more scary. How must the father have treated his daughter for her to be this way? Not a happy ending.

What's more, next week's episode of Harry's Law will feature another creepy kid. So tune in to the new time slot Sundays at 8 p.m. ET on NBC.

If you like my reviews, please follow me on Twitter! Article first published as TV Review: Harry's Law - "After the Lovin'" on Blogcritics.

Harry's Law finds the "Gorilla My Dreams"

     NBC's Harry's Law goes into some deep, moral issues with "Gorilla My Dreams." While duck hunting, Harry (Kathy Bates) and Tommy (Christopher McDonald) meet a young woman (Emily Rose, Haven, Brothers & Sisters) who is harboring an escaped gorilla. The zoo wants the animal back, but with an IQ near 90, and demonstrable self-awareness, communication skills, and emotion, the woman argues he belongs somewhere more kind. In the meantime, Adam (Nathan Corddry) defends a high school crush (Smallville's Erica Durance) who, after being abused and raped by her own husband, dresses up as Wonder Woman and beats on abusive spouses.

     First, the gorilla (pun intended) in the room in "Gorilla My Dreams." The gorilla is an obvious puppet, which does distract and take away from the story. Couldn't the series have hired a trained animal instead? Sure, the gorilla is required to do a fair amount of acting that might make it hard for a simple animal, but it would look far better. Also, no need to say the long name of that made up Cincinnati zoo so many times. The message is clear: Harry's Law doesn't want to be sued by the real Cincinnati Zoo.

     That aside, it's a fascinating story! Apparently, some European countries have already granted the great apes personhood in the eyes of the law. And why not? If they can think, reason, and communicate, doesn't that qualify them to deserve treatment above that of livestock? Yes, the law sees them as property, but perhaps they shouldn't be. Admittedly, that would make it hard for zoos and medical researchers to continue to use them in the manner they do. But that could be a good thing, too. If mankind is causing suffering of creatures how can feel it, be upset about it, and process what is happening, it doesn't seem right. One look into those big, black, mournful eyes, and there is no doubt in the viewer's mind that this monkey deserves to have his feelings taken into consideration.

     However, unlike David E. Kelley's previous legal dramedy, Boston Legal, a fantastic show, by the way, Harry's Law gets a little more realistic with these far-out cases. Harry loses, despite her best efforts, and the ape is returned to the zoo. This makes total sense from the standpoint of the judge, as there is no precedent in the American courtroom, and a TV series isn't likely to change that in the real world. Harry's Law would rather point out the flaws in the system and make fans grieve over the injustice then deliver a feel-good ending. This deserves kudos, because it is socially responsible. The message may resonate with someone who can change things, which would be a wonderful legacy to leave behind. And if it does, Harry, who vows to keep fighting for this particular ape, can revisit the case down the line and reach that happy ending yet.

     The second case in "Gorilla My Dreams" will resonate even more strongly. The justice system is feeling abused spouses, who have a hard time standing up to their tormentors, and an even harder time getting charges to stick. With little recourse, it's inspiring that a vigilante would rise up to offer protection. The reasonable arguments about why this cannot be allowed do ring true. However, that doesn't change the fact that something within the system is broken and needs fixing. As such, again, Harry's Law makes an issue out of something that isn't right in the world, hoping to shed a little light on it so that people may stand up and protest.

     Now, one may argue that Harry's Law is "just" a television show, and its sole purpose is to entertain, not spark societal change. But reviewing the body of Kelley's work, it seems obvious that there are other motivations as well. Plus, with the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street movements, now may be the perfect time to embark on such a mission. Current events have left the world hungry for positive action and a shift towards fairness. What better time to deliver a legal series to the airwaves that understands these feelings, and seeks to address them? Harry's Law might be a legal procedural, but it's a hell of a good one, and hopefully what is going on in the world at large will feed the show's success, and vice versa.

     Also, there were some escaped exotic animals on Ohio recently, so good pull from the headlines!

    From a purely television standpoint, it must also be mentioned that "Gorilla My Dreams" is packed to the gills with fantastic guest stars. Besides Durance and Rose, Tony Plana (Ugly Betty, Desperate Housewives) plays the judge deciding the vigilante case, Robert Picardo (Star Trek: Voyager) is an expert that testifies for the firm, and Bill Smitrovich (Kelley's The Practice) is Harry's courtroom opponent. Plus, Matt Servitto returns as Judge Kirkland for Harry's case, and he is always welcome. The fact that this show attracted so much talent for just one episode, and not even an event or sweeps episode, should overtly hint that something wonderful is happening here.

    Watch Harry's Law Wednesdays at 9 p.m. ET on NBC.

     If you like my reviews, please follow me on Twitter!

Harry's Law atones for "Sins of the Father"

     NBC's Harry's Law begins season two with a three-part episode, culminating in "Sins of the Father" this week. Harry (Kathy Bates) finally gets to court with Eric's (Alfred Molina, Law & Order: LA, Spider-Man 2) case. She argues fiercely, though a few, last minute surprises pop up. In the end, Harry plays a hunch and exposes D.A. Roseanna Remmick's (Jean Smart, 24, Samantha Who?) misconduct, spurring Judge Kirkland (Matt Servitto, Brotherhood, The Sopranos) to dismiss the case. It's only later that Harry realizes the real cold, calculating killer is Eric's daughter, Bethany (Daisy Betts, Persons Unknown).

     The Eric Sanders case is an intriguing legal mystery, recalling some of the best arcs of creator David E. Kelley's previous series, The Practice. There are twists and turns, a true villain of a prosecutor, and a fair-minded judge. There's a client that it is unclear whether he is guilty or not, and enough surprises to keep anyone interested. As such, "Sins of the Father," and the first two parts, "Hosanna Roseanna" and "There Will Be Blood," together make up a fascinating story and a strong season premiere.

    Harry's Law leaned more towards Kelley's Boston Legal than The Practice in season one, focusing on outrageous characters and situations. Considering that BL's run was much shorter than The Practice's, it may be a wise decision to pull back towards the serious. A dark, gruesome murder is not what one might expect from Harry's Law, so it certainly serves the purpose of defining the retooled show. Especially considering that the preview for episode four looks to be just as severe.

     But the show has not completely lost its fun side. The shoe store is still present, though Jenna (Brittany Snow), who runs it, has been reduced to guest star status, and is rarely seen. Instead, she has been replaced by Cassie Reynolds (Karen Olivo, Adrift in Manhattan), a serious and tough lawyer. Adam (Nate Corddry) is still around, but is less featured thus far. On the more outrageous side, Tommy Jefferson (Christopher McDonald) has been promoted to series regular, and shares office space with Harry. Which is good for Harry, because she needs him to loosen her up. Oliver Richard (Mark Valley, Boston Legal, Human Target) joins Harry for this case, and as he is a main character, probably for others. His constant insistence on repeating "Take it outside" lets him be a little goofier than his previous Kelley character, and it is nice to see him re-enter the universe.

     The biggest change in Harry's Law is a depressing one, though hopefully just temporary. While the series begins with Harry seriously depressed, she feels purpose throughout season one, helping those who truly need her. As season two begins, it is apparent right from the beginning she is back in her slump. She trudges around looking miserable, and has no fun on Eric's case. Tommy points this out to her, basically telling her that life is too short to be miserable. Thus, despite her new success, it may not be long before Harry chooses to downgrade again. Or, better yet, just reform the place she runs. It's nice to see her with staff and business, even if it comes a bit too quickly. So reappropriate the firm's resources, or give the darker cases to Oliver and Cassie. Harry has lost her spirit and she needs it back.

     That little musing takes nothing away from "Sins of the Father," in every way a brilliant, serious legal drama. Kudos to Harry's Law for producing such an engaging three-parter. Watch Harry's Law Wednesdays at 9 p.m. ET on NBC.

     If you like my reviews, please follow me on Twitter!

Harry's Law dances its "Last Dance" of the season

     NBC's Harry's Law just completed its first season this past Monday night. Only twelve episodes in the freshman season, not atypical, considering it did not premiere in the fall, though it is ending its run over a month before most of the spring finales. That's bad news, because it's been an enjoyable ride. At first, I thought it a lesser sibling to David E. Kelley's other awesome legal dramas, The Practice and Boston Legal, but it began to come into its own in the second half of the season, setting itself apart from the other two, and starting to define its identity. Good news for fans of the show, it looks pretty likely it will be renewed for a second season, though it is not yet official.

     While overall I am quite satisfied with the first season, I have some requests for season two. First, expand the cast. Four main characters is pretty small, especially for a Kelley series. Tommy (Christopher McDonald), Rachael (Jordana Spiro), and Damien (Johnny Ray Gill) all deserve upgrades. I would not argue against Peyton (Paul McCrane) or Judge Coulis (Amy Aquino) also making the cut, though find them less likely to, since they are more outside of the central circle. In a perfect world, Kim (Camryn Manheim) would join them, making a case for focusing on both the prosecution and the defense as The Practice did. But that is likely unrealistic, as she has already starred in a Kelley drama. I'd add Richard Kind to the list, but despite my affection for the actor, his character of Marty may not have the legs for full-time status. Just please make him recurring.

     I'm also almost ready for a new office. Because the shoe store has served so little function, I think it will be time to upgrade the digs by at least the middle of season two. I like the idea of Jenna selling shoes at the same place the other practice law, but it has not yet been very important to the story, and certainly never been a major plot element. We can loose the store easy enough, though they should stay in the same neighborhood, as that has become a character unto itself. Kelley said that Harry would begin to work her way up the ladder as the series went along, so let's see a bit of that. Just not so far up that she forgets where she is starting from. In conjunction with the set improvements, we also need some more income. Perhaps Tommy could join forces, but retain his type of clientele?

     In the finale, Harry (Kathy Bates) defends Josh 'Puck' Peyton, a frequent court room sparring partner of hers. Peyton, known for his tendency to repeat phrases, has been facing a bit of a breakdown, having stripped and ranted in the courtroom an episode earlier. Apparently, the craziness continued as he walked into a house that wasn't his, something that happened off screen before the episode begins. Harry is drawn to Peyton as she seems to be to all misfits who are essentially good people, and defends him. He gets off with a time served sentence, and a beautiful friendship is born. Let's hope Peyton's leaving the D.A. will not keep him off the series.

     Could there be something more than friendship between Harry and Peyton? While Harry seems to resist any romantic story, Peyton does ask her to be his date to a legal gala. She turns him down because she already has a date, the often obnoxiously over the top Tommy Jefferson. Here, Harry is sought after by two men, at least to accompany them for the evening. Yet, only her offense at Tommy complementing another woman shows even the slightest interest on her part of anything beyond one evening. Personally, I'd love to see Harry pursue either Tommy or Peyton, both fun characters. This is a side of the character that needs development.

     I do not understand the hesitation to take these steps towards romance. Perhaps it's because Harry's personality is so off putting, though that argument begins to fall apart when you look at just how many people befriend her whether she wants them or not. Either way, I think the older group needs to be given their relationship due as much as their younger counterparts.

     Both Tommy and Harry have had exes appear on the show, both played by fabulous actors. Harry's Marty (Richard Kind) is a defense lawyer, while Tommy's Kim is an assistant D.A., which opens up the door for both of them to return. It also means a Tommy-Harry pairing could come complete with already introduced past baggage to get in the way.

     Adam (Nathan Corddry) has ended his love triangle as things come to a head with Rachael (Jordana Spiro) in the finale. The two work together to try to stage an appeal for a client on death row (The Blind Side star Quinton Aaron). Of course, their feelings get in the way, as Adam has recently left his girlfriend and declared ongoing emotions for Rachael. Rachael, in turn, proposes to her boyfriend as a reaction. Her strong mood swings, one moment hating Adam, the next calling him her best friend, exhibit her own feelings for him, even if she has trouble deciding what to do. Kim lets the engagement slip in her office, making Adam ask for time apart from Rachael as soon as the case is finished.

     Honestly, I didn't know which element of the Adam and Rachael scenes to care about more. Obviously, I love me a good serial plot, and things between Adam and Rachael have been brewing for some time. I could have jumped up and down cheering when she shows up at his office at the end of the episode and kisses him. I assume she then left to break up with her fiance.

     On the other hand, Aaron makes a fantastic guest star, and his story is extremely moving, especially after he loses his appeal. I hope he returns in season two so that Adam and Rachael have anther chance to save him from execution. I believe he's innocent! Both Kim and Adam and Rachael made such strong arguments, I can accept that the duo lost. Yet, Aaron is such a great get for the show, it would be a shame not to see him again.

     I'm still not totally on board with Jenna (Brittany Snow) and Malcolm (Aml Ameen) as a couple. She has such a strong personality that he is likely to be completely overshadowed by her. Plus, Malcolm is on the verge of getting his life together, and has a lot of work ahead of him. I don't know he can possibly do well in law school and put up with the very high maintenance Jenna. I like both of them separately, but think they would work better with other people. Should they continue, at least stop the pattern of her getting angry at him in every episode and giving him the silent treatment until he has to apologize for something he didn't even know he did. Three consecutive episodes of it is fine, as have already been done, but any more, and it'll get old really quick.

     Thank you Kelley, Bates, and the rest for a nice show that proved pretty darn entertaining. I look forward to more of it.


Article first published as TV Review: Harry's Law - "Last Dance" on Blogcritics.

For an alphabetical list of all of Jerome Wetzel's Current Season Reviews, please click here.

For frequent mini-reviews and occasional TV news, follow Jerome on Twitter.