Lost was
a seminal television series that changed the face of network offerings.
Steeped in mystery, staffed with a large cast, questioning human nature
and philosophy, the show took six years to play out, sometimes doling
out the clues in tidbits, other times in waves.
When it came to an end in 2010, whether fans loved the ending or
hated it, many were saddened. Why not? They devoted years of their lives
watching the show, countless hours debating it with their friends, and
became extremely invested in the characters. Losing such a treasure is a
big blow, and not one easily recoverable. It takes a very, very special
series to replace such a loss.
I believe that
Once Upon a Time has the potential to be that replacement.
How can I say that, considering that the beginning of both shows are
quite different? On their faces, one is a modern day tale about a group
of strangers trapped on an island, while the other involves fairy tale
characters traversing world and possessing magic. And yet, there is so
much the two have in common. While
Once Upon a Time fervor may not yet have hit
Lost heights, it still can, especially if it continues to travel the same path, and as more viewers discover it online and on disc.
Some of these similarities are obvious. Both shows air(ed) on ABC.
They share producers Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis. Both count Emilie
de Ravin among their stars and Alan Dale as a recurring, but vital,
player. One of the most beloved actors from
Lost, Jorge Garcia, recently guest starred on
Once Upon a Time. Both delight in surprising the fans, making quick turns that change the game.
But it goes deeper than that, by far. For one thing, both deal with
differing personalities within the same person, and how these people
present themselves to the world. When we meet John Locke (Terry O'Quinn)
on the island, he seems confident and sure of himself, not afraid to
take a leadership position. Then we learn his back story, and see what
has led him to this moment, discovering he was once a very different
person, but is now embracing the new Locke. Yet, he is still not done
growing. Similarly, Regina (Lana Parrilla) is an evil Mayor / Queen, who
has a past that has changed her into this person, which she embraces.
Until she doesn't.
Both shows have very complicated characters that look a little odd,
and may or may not be bad, but are played by such fantastic actors that
the audience cannot get enough of them. I refer, of course, to Ben Linus
(Michael Emerson) and Rumplestiltskin (Robert Carlyle). Do we root for
them? More than we'd like to, sometimes. They have done detestable
things, and deserve to be reviled. But any excuse to see them on screen
is a good one, and when exposing their vulnerabilities, they are at
their best.
Both shows feature different worlds. On
Lost, this was a
little less obvious, but the present day mainland is quite different
from the island locale, and, in turn, the 1970s Dharma compound, in
which several characters from this millennium spend some time. On
Once Upon a Time,
they've gone the more literal route, presenting Storybrooke, fairy tale
land, Wonderland, and even a black and white horror realm. Each of
these places has different rules and different players that familiar
characters must navigate and interact with. But Storybrooke might as
well be an island, isolated from the rest of the world, and obeying
different laws of nature.
Both shows like to begin a season with a new setting and character,
startling the audience, and making the series feel fresh. Desmond's
(Henry Ian Cusick) introduction in the hatch is one of
Lost's
most memorable moments, making an impression that still amazes to this
day. Meeting Neal (Michael Raymond-James) at the start of season two of
Once Upon a Time feels like it is exactly in the vein.
Both shows have a huge supporting cast of characters, some of which
appear often, and some only pop up from time to time. These characters
can be connectors, tying central players together in unexpected ways, or
they may arrive to teach a lesson, or begin a quest, or fall in love,
or they may just be interesting side stories. Everyone has their
favorites (Nestor Carbonell's Richard, or Jessy Schram's Cinderella, or
Amy Acker's Astrid, or Katey Sagal's Helen, or Sonya Walger's Penny),
but there is no telling how often they may appear, or what importance
they will or will not hold.
Both shows have an annoying kid, and benefit when he is featured
less. I'm sorry, even though Henry (Jared S. Gilmore) can be a decent
addition to certain episodes, he is also a drag on plenty of others.
Lost
kind of has a similar problem with Walt (Malcolm David Kelley), whom
they promptly have kidnapped, and then send home. This wouldn't work
with Henry, as Emma (Jennifer Morrison) would become just as obsessed
with finding her son as Michael (Harold Perrineau) does, which would
ruin her character on the show, and she isn't as expendable. Walt still
appears from time to time throughout
Lost, and it he ends up
furthering the plot and becomes not as grating over time. But less is
more with many child actors, and the writers would do well to remember
that.
Both shows feature a flawed savior. Everyone believes in Jack
(Matthew Fox) most of the time, but he isn't always capable of making
the best decisions. He is reluctant to assume the leadership role, but
it is something he naturally falls back on because he wants to save
everyone. He also has made mistakes in the past. Emma is like Jack,
trying to be a good person and do the right thing, despite what she may
have previously done, and she has the ability to be a protector, unlike
most other characters.
Both shows are willing to execute major characters, or send them
away, leaving room to inject new blood, or expand a smaller role.
Lost
did this repeatedly, with some of the casualties including Boone (Ian
Somerhalder), Charlie (Dominic Monaghan), and Libby (Cynthia Watros).
Once Upon a Time,
not quite halfway through season two, has already killed off Sheriff
Graham (Jamie Dornan), had August (Eion Bailey) go missing, demoted
Jiminey (Raphael Sbarge), and promoted Belle (de Ravin) and Ruby (Meghan
Ory). But as any good
Lost fan knows, characters can return at
any time in the most unexpected places, so I wouldn't count out any of
these people yet. Not even the deceased Sheriff Graham, because...
Both shows feature flashbacks heavily, and often. Everyone knows that
a good way to learn about a character is to explore their past. But
most television shows use this element sparingly.
Lost and
Once Upon a Time
build entire episodes around such back stories, making them significant
chunks of the episodes on a weekly basis, and tying the past to the
present. When done right, it's clever and entertaining.
Mysteries abound. Why can't the Storybrooke residents leave their
town? How can the island move? Where is Rumple's son? What is the
sideways universe? Who is Dr. Whale (David Anders)? How did polar bears
get on the island? Some of these questions are answered quickly, others
take a longer period of time. Some things will never fully be
explained. But always keeping questions coming, never telling the full
story, keeps the show energized, and brings fans back week after week.
Plus, they both like smoke (purple or black, it doesn't matter) a whole lot.
Will
Once Upon a Time catch the wonderment and following that
Lost
possessed at its height? Does that really matter, as long as it is
allowed to run for years, and play out a sprawling, intricate story? The
point is, if you are a
Lost-ie looking for something to fill that hole in your life and you haven't given
Once Upon a Time
a chance yet (past the first few, admittedly poor, episodes), you are
missing out. They may seem like very different series, but they have
major similarities that should definitely appeal to the same types of
people.
Did I miss anything? The answer is most definitely (SPOILER ALERT!) yes. Feel free to weigh in on the comments below.
Jerome Wetzel has been reviewing television shows for years now.
However, not every thought can be contained in an article about a single
episode, and sometimes it's fun to look at the bigger picture. Join him
each week in this wandering essay column as he ponders trends and
genres, giving you his insights and opinions into the current state of
television.
Want to read some of my fiction? It's on my website,
JeromeWetzel.com! Also, for the latest updates and article links, as well as commentary on episodes I don't fully review, please
follow me on Twitter!
Article first published as Why Once Upon a Time Is the New Lost on Blogcritics.