Who's the BOSCH

Article first published as BOSCH Review on Seat42F.

Amazon’s new drama pilot, their first ordered to series, BOSCH, begs the question: do we need another police procedural? True, BOSCH is also a character study of a tormented man who is on trial for killing an unarmed suspect, so he’s not solely focused on whatever new cases he gets into (against orders, of course), but none of this is very original or groundbreaking. Perhaps the title character in this show takes a things a step further than his broadcast network peers, the writers digging a little deeper, but the first hour feels like yet another retread on very familiar ground.

The thing is, I just can’t jump on the Bosch band wagon. When Luther, Elementary, House, and so many other shows have given us a very similar leading man, there just isn’t enough here that feels fresh or new. Sure, there are cosmetic differences, of course, the quality of this program is at least as high, if not higher, than those others I’ve named. But at the central core, Bosch is lacking originality. And, like nearly half of the shows on television today, it takes place in L.A., a totally uninspired setting.

It’s possible to stay in the crime genre and make something fresh. HBO’s True Detective last year proves that. But BOSH isn’t True Detective, so it fails on an essential level.

The best thing I can say about BOSCH is that it casts Titus Welliver (Lost, Argo, Sons on Anarchy) in the main part. Welliver definitely deserves leading man status, and he easily handles the material, being allowed to show his depth and range in a way he hasn’t yet. From his buried pain over what he did, to the face he has to put forward both for the sake of his profession and so that he can try to live with himself, he’s not a shallow man. Bosch is no House; he is quite likeable. Circumstances have brought him to where he is, not mistakes he made with foreknowledge.

He is joined by an excellent ensemble. The other major characters include Scott Wilson (The Walking Dead), Annie Wesching (24), Lance Reddrick (Fringe), Amy Aquino (Being Human), Abraham Benrubi (ER), Amy Price-Francis (King), Alan Rosenberg (Cybill, Luck), Valerie Cruz (Off the Map), and Jamie Hector (The Wire). So many familiar names, and all of them memorable. One cannot complain about the casting.

What will set BOSCH apart a bit, for those who love the genre so much that they haven’t yet grown tired of it yet, is the dual narratives. Because Bosch is facing his own challenges while working at his job, and his personal story probably won’t only pop up a couple of times per season, as it would on CBS, there’s something interesting in every episode. It’s not enough for me, but it will likely be enough for many viewers.

So, at the end of the day, I don’t think it matters if BOSCH has smart writing, convincing acting, and well-developed characters. All of those things are true, and the series definitely is near the top of its field, but the market is too saturated. With Amazon just trying to break into scripted drama, it may have been a safe path to choose something tried and true, but it’s also a boring one. We didn’t need another show like BOSCH, and while it may make Amazon seem like a legitimate contender in the original content market, it also signals they may not forge their own identity, which is sorely needed to set them apart.

Bosch’s first season is available now on Amazon.com.

He's the BOSCH

Article first published as He's the BOSCH on TheTVKing.

Do we need an other police procedural, even if it's couched in a character study of a tormented man? That's what Amazon is delivering to us in Bosch, one of their first two drama pilots, currently streaming free on their website. The titular detective is simultaneously on trial for the murder of an unarmed suspect, while still digging into fresh cases, against orders. Can he escape jail and find peace?

It's hard to argue that Titus Welliver (The Good Wife, Lost, Sons of Anarchy, Argo) doesn't deserve a leading role. He absolutely does, and he definitely handles the main part of Bosch well. He lets us see the hurt it causes him to know he killed someone, beneath the bravado he must maintain to sleep at night and continue to do his job. He's a good man who accidentally did a bad thing, with cause, and thus a likeable protagonist.

The problem is, we already have plenty of these. Shows from Luther to Elementary to Justified to House have already given us pretty much the same archetype. There are differences of course, but these tend to be only cosmetic, and what sets each apart tends to be the quality of the writing and the ensemble, rather than any real originality in storytelling.

Bosch does lean towards the higher end of the spectrum. Part of this is because of the dual narratives, the court case and the current investigation, balancing each other nicely. Another part is the enjoyable ensemble, which includes Scott Wilson (The Walking Dead), Lance Reddick (Fringe), Amy Aquino (Being Human), Annie Wersching (24), Alan Rosenberg (Cybill, Luck), Valerie Cruz (Off the Map), Abraham Benrubi (ER), Amy Price-Francis (King), and Jamie Hector (The Wire). It's a great group of performers.

Bosch is better than most of the other crime shows. The writing is smart, the acting is convincing, and the characters are well developed. These are adjectives I frequently use to describe good shows, and it applies here, too.

But because the market is inundated with this type of drama, though,, it's not necessary to make another. I don't know if Amazon hopes that by delivering something so familiar, we'll see it as a legitimate television content provider. What is more likely, though, at least for those of us that consume lots of TV, is we'll see it as lazy, yet another clone for an already crowded genre.

What would set Bosch apart from its peers? Well, letting Bosch leave the law enforcement profession behind would be good. Or seeing him actually go to jail, the story following him as his life changes, and then the fight to overcome that. I'd like to see Bosch himself do more than just stay in the structure he's accustomed to. But this seems quite unlikely, as it's a much more challenging type of show to tell. Or, at least they could make the setting somewhere other than L.A., which has been done to death.

Making a brand new crime show worth watching isn't impossible; HBO's True Detective has proven that. Bosch just isn't True Detective-caliber, even as it's a notch above anything on the broadcast networks.

Bosch's first episode is available now on Amazon.com

HBO has all the Luck

The pilot episode of HBO's Luck, a new horse racing series, introduces a lot of characters, and isn't always clear on their role in the story. Most central may be Ace (Dustin Hoffman, I Heart Huckabees, Tootsie), who is released from a three year prison stint, in which he took the fall for an entire organization. Whether Ace is on the up and up with his old colleague (Alan Rosenberg, The Guardian, Cybill) is unknown, but Ace is definitely not keeping his activities legal, pursuing the secret purchase of a racetrack, and using his assistant/pal Gus, a.k.a. The Greek (Dennis Farina, Law & Order, Snatch), as a front to buy a horse. Ace also seems angry.

Hoffman has never starred in a television series before, and it's amazing to get someone with his level of talent on the small screen every week. Ace is a fuzzy character, a man of few words, but Hoffman conveys much with a glance or a tone. He's a tortured character whose motivations are incredibly murky to the audience, and thus, should be a rich, rewarding, role for Hoffman to play. With Rosenberg and Farina on board, too, both of whom are great with finding the comedy in dramatic moments, this is probably going to be the most central storyline, and a good one at that. It also, after just the first episode, draws one in quite completely.

Ace's, or rather, the Greek's, horse is trained by Escalante (John Ortiz, The Job, American Gangster), who is definitely not a nice man. Unlike Ace, Escalante wears his temper on his sleeve. He is well respected as a trainer, so perhaps his ability to do a great job is what draws people to work with him; it's certainly not a sunny disposition. But then again, it's entirely possible, given the circumstances around which his anger occurs, that perhaps Escalante isn't a bad guy. He could just be driven, and take his job very seriously. It's hard to tell. Though, going by gut, the first impression of him, as a world class jerk, will probably pan out.

The subject of Escalante's rage in the pilot of Luck is a jockey named Leon (Tom Payne, Waterloo Road), who somehow stays cheery despite getting it from both sides. The other side being the stereotypical, foul-mouthed, bully of an agent named Joey (Richard Kind, Spin City, Burn Notice). Joey and Leon are polar opposites in their outlook on life and how they treat others. As challenges arise, it will be interesting to see if either ones' outlook rubs off on the other or if they can continue to work together despite such a major personality clash.

Also competing in the racing arena is an old horse owner named Walter (Nick Nolte, Warrior, The Thin Red Line) who thinks he has found himself a new prize winner. While the animal is not yet ready to race, Walter has high hopes. What is Walter's story? Not many clues are present in the episode. He is shown talking to horses and employees, indicating a long history at the track which lends viewers to trust that he probably knows the game quite well. But that's about it. Will his steed be a rival for Ace's horse? Or will Walter's story progress in a different direction?

Finally, there is also a group of gamblers who take a long-shot and win big in the pilot. The ringleader of the gang seems to be Marcus (Kevin Dunn, Transformers, Samantha Who?), though the luck and genius brain that chooses said victors is all Jerry (Jason Gedrick, Desperate Housewives, Backdraft). The other two, Lonnie (Ian Hart, Dirt, Finding Neverland) and Renzo (Ritchie Coster, The Dark Knight) have less obvious roles so far in Luck. But it seems like their story hasn't even started yet, as the four don't cash in their winnings by the end of the hour.  Likely, the point of these guys is to dwell on what good luck and instant wealth does to people, and so they are not yet well defined or predictable.

Luck has a lot of things going for it. For one, it's on HBO, so it will be allowed a lot of freedom to do what it wants. If past series are any indication, Luck will be big and showy, but have plenty of nuance, and unexpected happenings. Secondly, the cast is terrific. Looking at the credits of just those listed above, plus all of the smaller parts that cannot be covered in a reasonable length review, means a lot of interesting, deep characters. Surely, their skills will be put to good use, and the tools are here for a lot of rich stories.

The world of Luck is also very vivid. It is painted with detail, all of it seemingly authentic. Even without experience in the world of horse racing, it's easy to see that a lot of care and research goes into the setting and roles. It's definitely very tuned into a specific place and time, with the actors easily inhabiting the world like they've always been there. Which makes it seem that the realism level is high, a big draw.

However, this last plus is also a weakness, at least in the pilot. It is nice that Luck trusts viewers to think on their own, but a little more exposition would be nice. Instead, the story begins with everyone and everything already in place, and spends little time walking potential fans through it all. It's very confusing, taking at least a half hour to even begin to grasp what is going on. The lingo is a mystery, and the rules of the race track and the betting that goes on there are not obvious. The characters understand everything so well that they have no need to explain it to each other, and by extension, the audience. Luck presents a nut very hard to crack into.

This could excite viewers. HBO has an intelligent group of subscribers who expect a lot from their programming. The Luck pilot could be a gamble that will pay off, if enough people are motivated to give the show the effort needed to get into it. As there are so many high quality aspects of the production, there is motivation to give it a chance. Repeat viewings and further episodes will probably make things quite a bit clearer. So despite a confusing start, Luck will be a winner, if viewers choose to turn into fans.

Any review of the Luck "Pilot" would be remiss without taking a moment to dwell on the animals so central to the story. In the first episode, Leon's steed breaks his leg and must be put down. The camera lingers on the horse's eye, allowing viewers a peek into his soul. Perhaps the audience won't have the personal connection the character of Leon has with the death, but the director's choices bring them pretty darn close. It's incredibly moving.

This could actually hurt Luck because that sequence calls into question the morality of horse racing as a sport. With fans caring about the horses so early and so deeply, will they be able to watch them pushed to their limits week after week? The scene above certainly makes this reviewer want to campaign for banning the entire industry on the grounds that it seems like cruel torture. Will Luck be about characters that must be despised? Or will the other side be presented?


Overall, the series is off to a great start, and gets better the more one dwells upon the episode. New installments will first run Sundays at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and the show has already been renewed for a second season.

If you like my reviews, please follow me on Twitter!

Article first published as TV Review: Luck - "Pilot" on Blogcritics.