BILLIONS Well Worth It

Article first published as BILLIONS Review on Seat42F.

Showtime’s new series BILLIONS is seemingly about a hedge fund manager and a U.S. Attorney, a battle of the big guy versus the common man, and a way to express class frustration in this country. But what it really is, is a drama about two flawed, petty men going at one another for all they’re worth, a battle to the death (perhaps not literally, but definitely of life as they know it), that only one man can walk away from, at best. And honestly, that’s plenty for me.

WARNING: Spoilers are below, but nothing more spoiler-y than Wikipedia reveals.

BILLIONS stars Paul Giamatti (Sideways, John Adams) as the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Chuck Rhoades. Chuck has a flawless record locking up those who deserve it, picking his cases carefully, and with a chip on his shoulder against the rich who think they’re above the rules. He is influenced by his successful father, and intimidated (sometimes positively) by his wife, Wendy (Maggie Siff, Sons of Anarchy, Mad Men), who makes far more money than he does.

Wendy makes so much because she works for Bobby Axelrod (Damian Lewis, Homeland, Wolf Hall), an extremely successful player in the financial game. Wendy is his motivational coach, though one wonders how much she knows about Bobby’s dalliances on the wrong side of the law. Bobby’s own wife, Lara (Malin Akerman, Watchmen, Trophy Wife), is certainly aware and supportive, even when it includes milking 9/11 for the family’s monetary gain. This couple sometimes pushes things a little too far.

Admittedly, that premise is a bit far-fetched. The coincidence of Wendy’s employment alone, though existing long before Chuck rose to power, stretches believability. Yet, the characters are perfectly positioned for maximum conflict and drama, so I don’t find myself minding all that much.

The primary reason to watch BILLIONS is Giamatti and Lewis. Both accomplished, excellent performers, watching them take these complex men and engage in a person struggle is highly engrossing. Both have noble qualities and glaring flaws, and both do things from a calculating perspective. They are two titans at the top of their game (a description of both the characters and the actors), and it’s a privilege to see them compete with abandon.

That isn’t to say the story isn’t enjoyable. Any series on Showtime these days is pretty darn good, with the network having a high level of quality in their programming. There are layers and twists and plenty of detail to keep things interesting, and the topic is relevant and current. I’m just saying that is secondary to the main attraction, the fight where viewers will be unsure of who to side with from one scene to the next.

What I’d most like to see change as time goes on is for Wendy and Lara to play an equal role in the proceedings. Wendy certainly does more than Lara in the pilot, but is still supporting to the men. The lead actresses are perfectly capable of standing toe-to-toe with their on-screen husbands, so I hope BILLIONS is gender-equal over time.

There is also a top tier supporting cast, including David Costabile (Breaking Bad, Suits) and Toby Leonard Moore (Daredevil, The Pacific), who play the assistants to our antiheroes. The production itself is pretty, and the direction is appropriate to the scale of the conflict.

In short, BILLIONS is exactly on par with what I expect from Showtime, if not a notch or two above some of its peers. I am definitely committed to watching it, and recommend you check it out. Like I said, if nothing else, you’ll likely enjoy the leads.

BILLIONS premieres Sunday at 10 pm on Showtime.

Leaving DOWNTON ABBEY Once More

Article first published as Leaving DOWNTON ABBEY Once More on TheTVKing.

*NOTE: This more an opinion piece than my typical review. As a fan of the series and the characters, it serves as a string-of-consciousness musing about the relationships and some of the threads of this past season. Your opinions may differ.

Now that another season of Downton Abbey, the British period drama airing on PBS, has come to an end, we can look back at the fourth season and reflect on what the show did both right and wrong. Overall, despite a gloomy start, it was a much lighter year than the last, and other than one major misstep, the story was quite good.

The finale itself was quite satisfying. Not only do we get the conclusion of some nagging stories, but the cast goes to London, providing a fresh setting. The servants' trip to the beach at the end is even more novel and amusing. There's an exciting story of espionage and scandal that doesn't ruin any of our characters' good names. There are absolutely fantastic moments for both the Dowager Countess (Maggie Smith) and Mrs. Crowley (Penelope Wilton), always welcome. Plus, Shirley MacLaine returned, and Paul Giamatti's part was much better than expected. It was a nice way to go out.

But really, most fans of Downton Abbey watch for the romance. The main thrust of much of the drama of the show revolves around who will be with who, and what will happen for them. There are other stories, to be sure, but not nearly as many that don't involve love, it seems. So how have the various pairings shifted this season?

A major arc this year involved Lady Mary's (Michelle Dockery) re-entry into the dating world. A wealthy widow, heir to a great estate, cannot allowed to remain single long. She was pursued by two suitors - Anthony Gillingham (Tom Cullen, World Without End), someone she considered "one of her own kind," and Charles Blake (Julian Ovenden, Foyle's War), who seemed out to bring down the aristocracy. Despite the easy decision on paper, Mary found herself torn between the two, unable to choose, even by the season finale.

It's nice to see Mary smile and be happy. She grieved an appropriate amount of time for Matthew, and then allowed both men to grow on her in pleasing ways. Both would make a good match, but I'm glad the question hasn't been settled yet, given how much fun it has been to see them both compete. It would not remain fun if it were stretched out after many years, but another season would be perfectly acceptable. Unlike when Mary was last eligible, there isn't any one man she's destined to be with, so there's a bit of suspense in the arc. As a firm supporter of "Team Blake," I was glad to see Charles get a leg up in the latest installment, hoping that's a sign that he could win in the end. But however it turns out, Mary declaring game on at the end was a terrific turning point for her.

Lady Rose's (Lily James) romantic prospects were not so cheery. I really liked her dalliance with jazz singer Jack Ross (Gary Carr, Death in Paradise) while it lasted, but it did seem pretty clear that a major part of Rose's attraction to Jack was the trouble it would cause. Besides, she's young, and it's enjoyable to see her single and carefree during her big coming out party, leaving the door open for times to come.

I'm not a fan of Tom (Allen Leech) and the school teacher Sarah Bunting (Daisy Lewis) being together. It's not that she's not an intellectual match for him; she is. But I don't see the chemistry and can't help but think Tom needs to determine his own path forward between the worlds before getting remarried. The arc of Tom feeling stuck in the middle of his roots and his new life has grown weary, but that's exactly why it's time for him to find a calling to dedicate himself to.

On the other hand, I am certainly in favor of Baxter (Raquel Cassidy) and Molesley (Kevin Doyle) being a couple. Molesely has been through some real down times, and while that befits the personality of his character, he doesn't deserve many of his troubles, and its gratifying to see him smile. Baxter spends much of this year being bullied by Thomas (Rob James-Collier), and it's awesome to see Molesley stand up for her, her knight in shining armor, an unlikely role for him to be cast in. That makes their pairing so perfect. Can we please see them marry next year?

So far, the servants have not had a good run of marriages. The only pair portrayed is Anna (Joanne Froggatt) and Mr. Bates (Brendan Coyle), and they've seen nothing but misery. This season's story of Bates killing Anna's rapist is depressing and sucky, something unnecessarily piled on. Mary almost turning Bates in is also completely unacceptable and out of character. Basically, everything surrounding this plot didn't belong in Downton Abbey and served as the significant weak point in an otherwise good year. Thank goodness it's over.

The other bit of bad luck is that annoying Daisy (Sophie McShera) didn't take the job offer in America, but at least we got rid of the almost-as-annoying Ivy (Cara Theobold) in the process. Now it's time for Mrs. Patmore (Lesley Nicol) to hire some decent help.

The season finale this year hints at something between Mr. Carson (Jim Carter) and Mrs. Hughes (Phyllis Logan). Yes, there have been signs of this before, but never such an obvious moment as when they hold hands while wading into the sea. The show might never "go there" for them, but wouldn't it be sweet if it did? There's obviously deep affection between them, and fans would love to see it. Why not?

Lastly, we get to Lady Edith (Laura Carmichael). Her love lost and her baby given up, she sinks into a dark place. This story was mixed for me. I absolutely loved how Lady Rosamund (Samantha Bond) comes to her aid, and was pleasantly surprised that the Dowager Countess acted mostly without judgment towards Edith. I also liked how Edith ignored them both and went to get her child back, something very much in keeping with her independent personality. The resolution, though, that Edith would have Tim (Andrew Scarborough) secretly raise the child for her was weak sauce. Edith needs to act like a mother, no matter what her family thinks.

In all, though, season four was a good one for Downton Abbey. Some have complained that it's disjointed and makes drama just for the sake of drama, and it does. But it's beautiful and well acted. Even when the writers make dumb mistakes, they usually get sorted out or moved past quickly enough for the show to go on, and there's always other examples of good writing in the same episodes. It's soapy but it's just different enough from other soapy works to really land. I look forward to season five.

Too Big to Fail is too good to fail

     HBO's newest TV movie is Too Big to Fail, a tale of the 2008 financial crisis in the United States, based on the book of the same name by New York Times financial columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin. Events follow real life, as Henry Paulson (William Hurt, Damages, Into the Wild), Timothy Geithner (Billy Crudup, Almost Famous, Watchmen), Ben Bernanke (Paul Giamatti, John Adams, Sideways), and their staffs try to prevent the next great depression. After bailing out Bear Sterns, Paulson is determined not to do the same for Lehman Brothers. He gathers the heads of the major investment banks, trying to push them into a private sector solution. When deals fall through, Paulson lets Lehman go bankrupt, and the economy goes from bad to worse as a result. The government employees scramble for another solution before a chain reaction cripples the country.

     Adding to the realism are actual news clips from the time, showing the real politicians and reports as the financial system gets worse and worse. These are not actors, played up for dramatic effect. These are real people reporting real stories. And Jon Stewart, ripping John McCain a (deservedly) new one.

     Is it a fair and balanced look at the fall of 2008? That's debatable. The writers have an opinion and a slant, as any dramatic work must, and so there is some bias towards certain parties. But there is also some grey area and debate, and so Too Big to Fail tries hard, and mostly succeeds, to at least give most everyone the benefit of the doubt. Or at least consideration that issues are complicated.

    The sprawling cast is top notch. There is a lot of star power, many in small roles, such as Ed Asner as Warren Buffett. Yet, not a single actor stands out as being inferior to the others. If anything can be said about HBO's films, it's that they do not shirk on casting. Each actor and actress shows a depth that really brings the characters, which are closely based on real people, to life in an authentic way. Most are matched quite well in looks, aided by expert makeup, though Crudup probably least physically resembles his counterpart, of the primary three.

     The bankers themselves are played by Tony Shalhoub (Monk, Wings), Evan Handler (Californication, Sex and the City), and Bill Pullman (Torchwood, Independence Day), among others. They are not really the blatant villains, as one might expect. While the companies they represent do take a large portion of the blame for what they have done, the men who run them generally come across as hard workers, willing to make sacrifices. They want to save their companies, but they are also willing to make a move that benefits the system as a whole, which in a roundabout way, does save their companies.

     That doesn't mean the bankers are heroes, by any stretch of the imagination. Obviously, it is because of them and their companies that the chain reaction of disaster begins. They also pocket American tax payer bailout money, which they will only take without strings, and continue to pay out huge bonuses. The public is justified in their anger at them. But because the film is made up mainly of closed door meetings of individuals, these things are sometimes downplayed, making them seem like decent guys. Hallway rants by Paulson allude to another side of the story.

    Actually, the people who come off the worst in the film are James Woods (Shark), as the head of Lehman who hesitates to try to make more money, not realizing it's too late to save the bank, and Congress, especially John McCain and the GOP. They are all slow to act, and work against what Paulson insists is necessary. It's a battle to get them to do what has to be done, and because of them, the whole system almost goes belly up several times.

     Also looking bad are the British, who have a chance to help, but sabotage a good deal that may have saved the system at the last minute. Furthermore, they begin to freeze credit after Lehman's collapse, worsening the situation. While Europe will be deeply hurt by what happens on Wall Street, they show an unwillingness to believe that America can take them down, too.

     Asians also have a chance to step in, but choose not to. One Asian company does help buy one of the American banks, but several deals with friends in the Pacific fall through as they back away from toxic assets. And who can really blame them?

     Paulson, who is really the central character, has a staff that includes actors Topher Grace (That '70's Show, Spider-man 3) and Cynthia Nixon (Sex and the City, The Big C). They try very hard to not only help their boss fix things, but also to keep him healthy, as Paulson is plagued by a lack of sleep, and looks worse and worse as the movie progresses. They are the heroes of the story, tirelessly putting their lives on hold to save the country. Whether that is true or not, the way the trio comes across makes it very easy to root for them.

     The story itself is a gripping tale of horror. What makes it even scarier is that not only is is true, but the problems shown are far from solved. A scroll at the end tells viewers that the same conditions exist today, and the economy could still easily go over the precipice, since the government has failed to act to change anything significant in the two and a half years since the events unfolded. It's a chilling realization, not one that gives any comfort.


     Too Big to Fail will repeat numerous times on HBO over the next few weeks. If you have not caught it yet, make sure to do so soon.

     If you like my reviews, please follow me on Twitter! Click here for all of my Current Season Reviews.

     Please click here to buy the book on which Too Big to Fail is based.

Article first published as TV Review: Too Big to Fail on Blogcritics.