LOVECRAFT COUNTRY a Fantastical (and Scary) Place

Article first published as TV Review: LOVECRAFT COUNTRY on Seat42F.

HBO premiered LOVECRAFT COUNTRY this week. Based on the novel of the same name by Matt Ruff, it has been adapted to television by Misha Green (Underground) and produced by the likes of Jordan Peele and J. J. Abrams. The story follows a man named Atticus Freeman, his uncle George, and Atticus’ friend Letitita as they flee and fight murderous bigots on their way to find Atticus’ missing father. It’s a fantasy-horror-sci-fi adventure that tackles race head-on, and is set in 1954, when Jim Crowe ran rampant.

This show is excellent, and I mean that on every level. To start with, the style and production of LOVECRAFT COUNTRY look fantastic. It’s a grounded period piece, that also has fantasy elements in the style of author H.P. Lovecraft (obviously). Yet, these are blended in such a way that, even what shouldn’t be able to occur, feels like it fits into this world. It’s also a well-conceived universe, aided by actual history, that has layers beneath the surface and a lot going on.

For instance, one of the leads in LOVECRAFT COUNTRY, Uncle George Freeman (Courtney B. Vance, American Crime Story), is in a loving marriage with Hippolyta (Aunjanue Ellis, Quantico), living in a small town while pursuing travel and astronomy, respectively. George’s travel guides specifically tell African Americans where it is safe to stop on their troubles. Which means it makes perfect sense when George accompanies his nephew, Atticus (Jonathan Majors, When We Rise), on Atticus’ quest to find his father, given his unusual employment and the wanderlust he shares with his wife.

In contrast to this perfect-seeming family, Atticus’ own immediate clan is pretty messy. Atticus doesn’t have an easy relationship with his father, and there’s mystery surrounding Atticus’ mother. There is also tension between Atticus and George, so even within the happy abode, there is drama. The third lead, Leti Lewis (Jurnee Smollett-Bell, True Blood, Friday Night Nights), doesn’t get along well with her siblings (we see two in the pilot), so there are lots of juicy personal interactions to pick apart.

Which means when the danger hits in LOVECRAFT COUNTRY, there are already stakes. We care about Atticus, George, and Leti very quickly, and it would be a major blow to the story if any one of them didn’t make it. Which seems like a distinct possibility, given the monsters and creatures they face.

The monsters being the white people who don’t want the trio, or anyone that looks like them, around. By the time the multi-eyed animal forest dwellers attack, horror has already taken place, from a chase down a road, to guns in the woods. There is a very real feeling of danger, much in the style of Peele’s Get Out, as our protagonists stare into the empty eyes of people who want them dead for no reason more than the color of their skin. Sure, some will complain about the one-dimensionality of these antagonists. But I think we’ll get a little more complexity as things go along, and given the situations presented, it makes sense to simplify it in the way that it is.

All three of the lead actors are performing the hell out of the piece, and several of the supporting players make impressions, too, especially Ellis and Wunmi Mosaku (Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them) as Ruby Baptiste, Leti’s darker skinned half-sister with a killer singing voice and a strong will.

My only complaint about the first episode is I feel I don’t fully understand the scope of the story LOVERCRAFT COUNTRY seeks to tell. I really would have felt better with a second episode before I wrote my review. I can tell the show is great, I’m just not entirely sure what it is, as it seems like there’s more than presented in the first hour.

TED LASSO Hired For This Team

Article first published as TV Review: TED LASSO on Seat42F.

This past Friday, Apple TV Plus launched TED LASSO, a half-hour dramedy about a perpetually cheery amateur football coach from the United States hired to head a pro-level football team in the UK. And as you probably know, football in the UK is not the same as football in the US; they’re two different sports. No, this is not a mistake, the decision to hire Ted was purposeful, and now we’ll see how this guy does in an extreme fish-out-of-water scenario.

I’ll be honest, I did not expect to like TED LASSO just from the logline. I’m not a big fan of sports (or a fan at all), and I hate dumb-guy comedies, especially where the jokes are played on the man’s ignorance. But because it was created by Bill Lawrence (Scrubs) and Jason Sudeikis (Saturday Night Live), the latter of whom also stars, and both of whom have delivered funny very well in the past, I tried to keep an open mind going in.

Boy, am I glad that I did. TED LASSO is wonderful. It’s not dumb-guy comedy, and while there are humorous jokes, it’s not a straight-out comedy at all. It’s a moving piece with layered characters and emotional situations that will tug your heart strings just as often as it tickles your funny bone. And in the first two episodes, it’s not about sports at all. (Though, if it later becomes so, Friday Night Lights has already proven that good television trumps a distaste for athletics.)

Much of the success of Lasso can be credited to the writing. But much can also be credited to Sudeikis’ performance as the titular character. It would be so easy to dismiss Ted on his face. Yet, Sudeikis plays him with genuine earnestness and depth that keeps him from being a cartoon. Small scenes, when Ted is alone in his apartment or on the phone, prove just how much his caring is genuine, not an act at all. His coaching style, one in which he focuses way more on team cohesion than logistics of play, is also inspiring and one can see how it would work – when the team already has plenty of talent to make up the other side.

Though, it’s quite possible that Ted’s assistant, Coach Beard (Brendan Hunt, Bless This Mess), is the one who actually knows how the game is played and helps on that front. I think there is more to Coach Beard’s words about “fast” in episode two than plays for the joke. So together, they make a decent manager.

TED LASSO avoids dropping into the typical out-of-one’s-element tropes by making Ted curious and accepting of his surroundings, as he is about the team. There are exceptions, of course; Ted hates tea. But by minimizing that element, it keeps the show from being too silly.

Perhaps the main draw is a message that optimism can win. In these dark times, it’s easy to give in to the hate and vitriolic and tension between sides in this country, and around the world. So often, we dismiss our fellow humans because of their beliefs, and while we may often feel justified (maybe actually be justified) in doing so, it’s heart-warming and hopeful to see someone approaching things differently and succeeding.

Of course, Ted will still have his fair share of obstacles to overcome. The main antagonist is revealed at the end of the pilot, and I was pretty surprised. Though I also see how Ted may defuse the situation without making any real enemies.

TED LASSO is buoyed by a wonderful supporting cast, including Juno Temple (Maleficent) as a player’s girlfriend, Hannah Waddingham (Krypton) as the club owner, Jeremy Swift (Downton Abbey) as the communications manager, and Nick Mohammed (Intelligence) a the equipment boy.

I’ve been lassoed by Ted, and I’m anxious to see what else is in store. The first three episodes are available now on Apple TV Plus, with new installments dropping every Friday

Go Below With STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS

 Article first published as TV Review: STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS on Seat42F.

A new kind of STAR TREK has arrived, with STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS premiering today on CBS Access. It follows the ensigns who work on the lower decks of the starship U.S.S. Cerritos and do the grunt work of the vessel, not getting the credit and glory the senior staff enjoy. Oh, and it’s a cartoon.

Believe it or not, this is not the first animated Star Trek series. There was a show in the early 1970s called Star Trek: The Animated Series that starred the same cast as the original show, voicing their characters on continuing missions. That series took the liberties of a few big aliens and worlds that the live action budget could never have achieved, but was basically the same type of story the original had already told, albeit shorter. And also, speaking as someone who has seen all twenty-two episodes because I’m that kind of Star Trek fan, it was pretty bad.

STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS doesn’t need to go bigger on aliens, as Star Trek now has the budget and technology to do some pretty incredible stuff. It does, though, because why not? If you can do show races or shots you want, go for it.

My only complaint of this aspect is that it feels just a bit too cartoon-y. I’m not saying it should be as grounded as the its processor because, why even bother to make it animated then? But it’s just a tad too zany for the Star Trek universe, in my opinion. A cross between The Orville and Rick and Morty, I wish it been more of a cross between The Orville and Star Trek: The Next Generation.

TNG is the series that STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS owes the most to. It is set shortly after Star Trek: Nemesis, before disaster rocked the Federation and shook Starfleet to its core, as shown in Star Trek: Picard. This is from those post-Dominion War lighter times, with uniforms and starship design to match. The references are many and varied, and pull plenty of original series in, too, with Spock and Kirk getting shout-outs in the pilot. The visuals are full of Easter eggs, especially in the theme song, so it does feel set in the Trek universe, even if a few things get a little too wild.

The idea of focusing on the non-bridge crew has been around for awhile on Star Trek. It was the plot of a Star Trek: The Next Generation episode, also called “Lower Decks,” and is the subject of much fan speculation. So it makes sense in a time where we’re getting so much Trek, we’d eventually get around to that idea.

A great cast has been assembled. Tawny Newsome (Space Force) steals the show as Ensign Mariner, a very capable young woman who has problems with authority and a huge chip on her shoulder. She has the most interesting story, to be sure, but even if she didn’t, Newsome would shine. Her sidekick is Ens. Boimler (Jack Quaid, The Boys), who is much more predictable, but hopefully will grow over time. Secondary to the pair are Ens. Tendi (Noel Wells, Saturday Night Live) and Ens. Rutherford (Eugene Cordero, The Good Place), who are obsessed with their work in the most delightful way, and are surely destined to be a romantic couple.

But unfortunately, STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS doesn’t commit to this conceit of just portraying the junior staff. Instead, we see Captain Freeman (Dawnn Lewis, A Different World), Commander Random (Jerry O’Connell, Billions), Dr. T’Ana (Gillian Vigman, Suburgatory), and other senior staff pretty regularly. And of course these characters are great. But they aren’t needed, and I think the show would be far more interesting if we saw them only fleetingly if at all, like the president in the early seasons of Veep. I could excuse the captain, given her role in relation to one of the core group, and even the doctor popping up makes sense when Tendi is on duty. But the others are in the show too much.

In short, I like the show. Quite a lot, actually. But I think it misses the mark in a few areas that would elevate it to something really special. It’s good, but it could be great, and the squandered potential is a bit sad. Even if I still want it to run for years while I obsessively watch every episode. After all, it is easily the best animated Star Trek series ever made.

STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS streams new episodes every Thursday on CBS All Access, beginning today.

WE HUNT TOGETHER For the Best TV

Article first published as TV Review: WE HUNT TOGETHER on Seat42F.

This weekend, Showtime premieres the drama WE HUNT TOGETHER. Made by BBC Studios and already aired overseas, the six-episode run is now making its stateside debut. It follows two serial killers, who may be in love, or possibly the attraction is one-sided, as well as two detectives that don’t seem to get along at all who are hunting the murderers. Which pair will you root for and who will win?

Honestly, WE HUNT TOGETHER doesn’t feel all that fresh. Yes, it has two pairs instead of one, but the British crime drama of cops hunting a killer is now so well established that there are dozens of other shows to compare it to. It’s become as tired and overdone as American procedurals, helped along only by the fact that the seasons are shorter (and storytelling is serial), and the accents and locales are slightly exotic. Yes, it’s well-written and well-performed, but so is pretty much every other program in the genre.

The detectives are played by Eve Myles (Torchwood) and Babou Ceesay (Into the Badlands). It’s great to see Myles in a regular role again, and DS Lola Franks is delightfully grumpy, a bit of a departure from her most well-known role, though not exactly a new archetype. Ceesay’s Jackson Mendy is a bit more original, an always cheery man who also works with internal affairs, investigating crooked cops. You would think that would make Mendy jaded and suspicious of his fellow officers, but Franks is the one who views him with a wary eye. The joyful detective is something pretty new, usually a character like this being outside the force or in a supporting role, so their scenes play better to me than the others.

The opposing side of WE HUNT TOGETHER follows Freddy Lane (Hermione Corfield, The Halycon) and Baba (Dipo Ola, Baghdad Central). The chemistry between them is instant, or so it seems, given the circumstances of their meeting. Freddy seems attracted to Baba right away, but could that be because he saves her? She then uses his obvious mutual feelings to manipulate him into helping her kill people. The first guy they take out is a real jerk, but who knows who their next victim will be? Is Freddy delighted to find the Clyde to her Bonnie (with murdering), or is she just using Baba to do her dirty work? It’s impossible to tell from the initial premiere.

WE HUNT TOGETHER is enjoyable; don’t get me wrong. I’m sure the story can sustain viewers who are interested through six installments. But with KILLING EVE being the premiere cat-and-mouse thriller of the moment, and with the myriad of other shows in the vein, will this one stand out? I’m just not sure it will.

Why did Showtime buy the drama, is my question. It doesn’t seem super on-brand for them, unless they’re branching out. Their series tend to be more outrageous than WE HUNT TOGETHER, which is relatively grounded. If they’re trying to fill programming at a time when filming has basically stopped, it seems a little early to be pulling from the international well. Other networks have this niche covered, and it seems weird Showtime would want to compete for the corner. Especially when I’m sure there are foreign shows they could pursue that are more in their wheelhouse.

Whatever the reason, WE HUNT TOGETHER is good, not great. Or maybe it would have been seen as great if it didn’t open itself up so fully to comparison of others. The fact that the show hasn’t even rated a Wikipedia page yet, months after its British premiere, should tell you something about its chances at longevity.

WE HUNT TOGETHER airs Sundays at 10PM on Showtime.