NASHVILLE Falls to Pieces

Article first published as NASHVILLE Falls to Pieces on TheTVKing.

ABC's Nashville, the soapy drama set in the world of country music, came rocking back last night with "I Fall to Pieces." Two weeks after the events of last spring's cliffhanger finale, Rayna (Connie Britton) is still in a coma, Deacon (Charles Esten) is in jail after telling the police that he drove drunk, causing he and Rayna's crash, and Juliette (Hayden Panettiere) worries about how Rayna's failing health will overshadow her own album release. So, not much has changed, despite the huge event.

Actually, Juliette is not nearly as bad as she seems. If she's fooling anyone, it's herself. Yes, she milks Rayna's coma for all it's worth at her album release concert, which is a terribly selfish thing to do, and should tick fans off. But once Juliette actually visits Rayna in the hospital, the young star falls apart, rethinking her uncaring attitude. Rayna has made an impact on Juliette's life, and while Juliette can try to deny it all she wants, she's a better person for it. It's why she decides to arrange Deacon's bail, even if she has a bad history with addicts.

Deacon is actively self-destructive, lying about driving. He's in a very dark place prior to the car wreck, and he sees a way to remove himself from the world, at least for awhile. Perhaps there's also the thought going through his mind that he doesn't want to live if Rayna is dead, but more importantly he is punishing himself. He thinks he belongs behind bars and separate from everyone else.

In flashback, we see Deacon and Rayna's early relationship. Besides being an impressive visual, with both performers looking much younger, this gives us a chance to view them at both their best and their worst. It's easy to see how Deacon can blame himself for screwing things up, but it's also certain they work well as a couple. Maybe when all this is behind them, they can make a go of it, with Rayna able to forgive Deacon after seeing how low he's sunk and how bad he feels. That is, if Deacon can stay sober.

Deacon does have some help in that regard. Scarlett (Clare Bowen), having turned down Gunnar's (Sam Palladio) proposal, works on securing bail for Deacon, and decides to move in with her uncle. As much as Deacon attempts to run Scarlett off, I'm glad she sticks around anyway. It's a rough sacrifice for her to make, putting parts of her life on hold to help Deacon, but maybe she'll finally get through to him and help him heal. As long as this doesn't destroy her just-launching music career, it's a nice development, giving both family when they need it.

Gunnar hasn't given up on Scarlett, even if she did say no to marriage. They share a very nice moment, performing together once more, and he vows to work to win her back. When last season ended, they were not in a healthy place to move forward, and two weeks doesn't fix everything. But "I Fall to Pieces" hints that there will be a second chance for them, and maybe they won't end up split for so long like Deacon and Rayna.

Rayna's accident does bring her family together in a way they haven't been for some time. Tandy (Judith Hoag), Lamar (Powers Boothe), and Teddy (Eric Close) are actually able to be in the same room together! It won't last, especially as a new secret rears its ugly head, so it isn't as touching as it should be. But at least Rayna's loved ones are there for her in her time of need.

Lamar has actually been downgraded to recurring status this season. That's not a guarantee that he'll be sent away or locked up, but that does increase the likelihood that he won't remain as involved in his daughters' lives as he has previously. It's sad to see parents and children drift apart, but if Lamar really did what Tandy hears he's done, he doesn't deserve the girls in his life, anyway.

"I Fall to Pieces" remains just as full of everything that makes Nashville so deliciously compelling as it was in season one. It's a prime-time soap, to be sure, but it embraces that part of itself and is well-suited for the genre. I look forward to more tumultous romances, twists, and turns this year and for many more after.

Nashville airs Wednesdays at 10 p.m. ET on ABC.

NASHVILLE Sings

Article first published as DVD Review: 'Nashville - The Complete First Season' on Blogcritics.

Last fall, ABC’s Nashville introduced us to Rayna James (Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights), a country music queen whose career is on the downswing. Her production company has an idea – team her up with hot young ingenue Juliette Barnes (Hayden Panettiere, Heroes) – and Rayna can rise to the top again. It’s synergy made in production heaven.

As the 21 episodes of The Complete First Season, now available in a five-disc DVD set, reveal,  things are quite a bit more complicated. For one, Rayna and Juliette do not get along in the slightest, both having preconceived notions about one another, and clashing upon meeting. For another, they’d both like to work with Rayna’s long-time guitar player and former lover (and recovering alcoholic), Deacon Claybourne (Charles Esten, Big Love, Enlightened).

On the home front, Rayna’s life is no easier. Husband Teddy Conrad (Eric Close, Without a Trace) is involved in politics, as is Rayna’s manipulative father, Lamar Wyatt (Powers Boothe, Deadwood), and close family friend Coleman Carlisle (Robert Wisdom, The Wire), making the race for mayor of the big city quite messy. Toss in Rayna’s heir-apparent sister, Tandy (Judith Hoag, Big Love), and Rayna’s daughters, Maddie (Lennon Stella) and Daphne (Maisy Stella), and it’s no wonder Rayna is distracted on the road, priorities warring for attention.

As Juliette struggles to stay in the public eye, her every decision becomes gossip fodder, fueling her perception (somewhat warranted) as a diva. Whether she’s going through tumultuous relationships, dealing with addict mother, Jolene (Sylvia Jefferies, The Notebook), or fighting with manager Bucky (David Alford, Stoker), she is constantly judged, and her motivations dissected. Nashville shows us the pressures of someone in this position, a timely tale in today’s celebrity-obsessed world.

Nashville may center on the big stars, but it also takes us to the other end of the music scene. Deacon’s niece, writer Scarlett O’Connor (Clare Bowen, The Clinic) is just getting started, unintentionally being found in a bar along with her performing partner, Gunnar Scott (Sam Palladio, Episodes). Gunnar is love with Scarlett, complicating the arrangement, especially as Scarlett is with Avery Barkley (Jonathan Jackson, General Hospital), a band leader who soon becomes jealous of his girlfriend’s success.

If you think that’s a sprawling cast, you’d be right. But it takes that many people to keep a soapy drama chugging along week after week, as broadcast television demands a lot of installments per year. Nashville holds its own on the cluttered landscape, carving a new path deserving of attention. The personal dynamics may be familiar, but the setting is fresh, the plot twists keep coming, and it’s rarely stale.

The series also boasts some fine performances. Britton is well-known among many television fans for her previous work, and it’s no surprise at the range and layers she exhibits in such a plumb starring position. What may be unexpected is that Panettiere, mostly known as “the cheerleader” from a superhero series, matches her scene for scene, a worthy partner on screen. These two women are Nashville, and they could not have been any better cast.

Of course, Nashville would be nothing if its music sucked, with songs playing such an integral part in the production. Thankfully, there is a crack team behind the original numbers, delivering us ballads, pop standards, and moving soul-searchers, with a bit of rock tossed in here and there. There aren’t any real duds, and the musical numbers are often delivered with great effect, not being forced or squandered to fill an episode. As someone who isn’t even really into the country genre, there is still plenty to appreciate in Nashville.

There are a smattering of special features in this release, nothing groundbreaking, but serviceable enough. Deleted scenes and bloopers, the go-to inclusions, are present, along with a trio of featurettes about the titular city, the music behind the show, and a set tour. Unfortunately, there are no commentaries, and the extras are short on time with the actors, which is a bit of a disappointment. Who doesn’t want to see Britton and Panettiere talk about one another and the show? Perhaps that will be made up in future season sets? Still, combined with the episodes, worth a look.

Nashville – The Complete First Season is available now.

ABC's Split Season

Article first published as ABC's Split Season on Blogcritics.

In the never-ending quest to combat ratings erosion, ABC has decided to swing big, presenting several of its one-hour dramas in split seasons this coming year. I don’t know if it’ll be successful or not, but I think fans will appreciate it.

The idea seemed to begin with Once Upon a Time. Frustrated by falling viewer numbers after off-weeks, a plan was hatched to divide the installments into two “mini-seasons” (or regular-sized seasons for a cable network), and develop Once Upon a Time in Wonderland as a limited-run filler, bridging the gap between the two, thus ensuring nearly-constant Once Upon a Time goodness streaming to our televisions from September through May.

Unfortunately (or possible fortunately), Once Upon a Time in Wonderland was deemed too good to be mere filler, and got its own berth on the fall schedule. But the plan for Once Upon a Time was preserved, as the stories had already begin to be structured with this schedule in mind, and another mid-season show will be tapped to mind the gap.

Once Upon a Time isn’t the only show getting this treatment. It has been announced that fellow popular ABC dramas Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal, Nashville, and Revenge will follow suit. All of these are serial and mostly soapy, so this will fit better for their story arcs. Fans won’t have to wonder if their favorite show will air a certain week, and momentum can be built for months at a time, rather than constantly being interrupted by reruns.

This is not a new concept. ABC discovered Lost also worked better uninterrupted, splitting one season in two parts, and then doing a reduced number of episodes in one blast for the rest of the show’s run to stay cohesive. FOX also switched 24 to a straight January through May run for the last several years of that show’s life.

Given that this method worked for those two shows, it’s a little surprising it’s taken this long to try it again. Perhaps the networks thought it was something that should only be reserved for special event shows. Whatever the reason, though, doing it so widespread, with series that lots of people watch and engage with, should be a true test to the durability of the concept.

It’s also smart that ABC plans to fill the holes in the middle with new shows. For one, this should give good exposure to freshman series, with fans of established dramas tuning in to their normal time slot and possible willing to consider giving a chance to something fresh. Secondly, new fare is always preferable to reruns, a much-less-relevant idea in the age of DVRs, Hulu, and Netflix.

I don’t see this being adapted across the board, though. Television is not a one-size-fits all medium, as we’ve already seen in this new era of streaming services and internet shorts. There is a lot of room for different experimentation. And procedurals and sitcoms, which don’t typically build tension week-to-week, don’t need something like this to keep them going.

What I wonder is, will this prompt cable to try the same thing? USA already splits sixteen to twenty-episode seasons of many of its shows. And AMC presents The Walking Dead in a pair of eight-episode morsels. If ABC can deliver what basically amounts to two complete cable runs in a single year and keep quality up, AMC, FX, Showtime, HBO, and TNT might feel pressured to do the same.

The key there is quality, though. I absolutely adore Grey’s Anatomy and a couple of the others listed above, but I would not say they are as good as The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, The Newsroom, and a number of other cable offerings. Many believe that writers for the cable shows can deliver a higher bar with the extra time off, and show runners can certainly be more involved in each episode. It doesn’t matter how episodes air if they aren’t up to a certain standard.

Bottom line, there will probably be a place in the future for any kind of television show, running on any schedule, that networks care to make and viewers care to tune in for. The split-season idea is a very good one for these shows, but it won’t solve the larger issues broadcast TV faces, and it won’t help in every case. It’s just heartening to see effort put into an inventive, smart idea. We need more of this.

NASHVILLE Alive and Well

Article first published as NASHVILLE Alive and Well on TheTVKing.

If anyone in the television industry still thinks that Hayden Panettiere, the cheerleader from Heroes, can't hold her own against Tami Taylor herself, Connie Britton, that person need only watch "I'll Never Get Out of This World Alive," the first season finale of ABC's Nashville, to have their mind forever changed.

Panettiere's Juliette, a young country music superstar, prepares for the CMAs, in which she hopes to beat Britton's Rayna James, a legend in her own time, for a prestigious award. But Juliette's night is sidelined when her drug addict mother, Jolene (Sylvia Jeffries, Eastbound & Down), is found dead of an overdose, her sober companion Dante (Jay Hernandez) murdered by a gun beside her. Juliette tries to go on, but soon finds herself bogged down with grief.

Panettiere's performance is extremely impressive. The way she captures Juliette, who is not herself naturally a nice person, with all of the layers of her emotions, is extraordinary. Juliette has wished for Jolene to be dead, but also loves the mother who has made her life so complicated. This isn't a story just anyone can relate to, with most people having better dynamics with their parents, but it's easy to see just how talented Panettiere is when capturing all of Juliette's conflicting feelings.

This continues past the CMAs, to Jolene's funeral, and then a tribute performance at the Bluebird. We see Juliette honor her mother, and be angry at her. We also see Juliette get support from the people she clashes with, Rayna, Deacon (Charles Esten), and her former manager Bucky (David Alford). It's a time for Juliette to reconsider her life and her values, and she comes out stronger than ever.

Which means, unlike in Nashville's freshman year, she may be ready for a serious, mature relationship. The most likely candidate to begin this journey with her is Avery (Jonathan Jackson), who has undergone his own trials this season, only to emerge from the other side a better developed person. They both deserve love, are good people, and have worked to improve themselves. I hope this happens for them.

Oh, and Juliette wins the award, which should matter next season, even if it doesn't right now.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, things completely fall apart between Rayna and Deacon. The pair may have destiny on their side, but a host of tribulations have kept them separated from some time, and it's past mistakes that haunt them now. Deacon learns that Rayna has lied to him about the parentage of their daughter, Maddie (Lennon Stella), and falls off the wagon in a severe way.

If there is ever a sympathetic reason to give up thirteen years of sobriety to return to one's bad habits it is learning that the woman who you consider the love of your life has a daughter by you that she has claimed to be another man's for a very long time. Still, it's very depressing to see Deacon, a beloved character who has been doing so well, sink to such depths.

Rayna is going to have to distance herself from Deacon. She has two daughters to worry about, and they can't be around someone so unstable. In fact, the ending of "I'll Never Get Out of This World Alive" finds Rayna flipping Deacon's truck as they fight, crashing. This is clearly not a healthy relationship and has to end until Deacon pulls himself back together.

Despite the recent death of Dante and Jolene, it's unlikely either Rayna or Deacon did not survive the wreck. They are too central to Nashville, and the series would not be the same without them. But it should serve as a wake-up call for their behavior.

In the meantime, with Deacon so messed up, Teddy (Eric Close) won't have any trouble keeping Maddie. There is a reason Rayna chose him to be Maddie's father, and Teddy loves Maddie. He won't do anything to jeopardize the girl, and will be there for her at this time when she needs him. It's not fair for Maddie to only blame Rayna for the lie, but Teddy is a good influence in Maddie's life and should remain so.

That is, as long as he beats Rayna's father, Lamar (Powers Boothe) at his political game. Lamar crosses a major line by taking legal action against Teddy, something that could disrupt his granddaughters' lives and ruin the just-repaired relationship between Lamar and Rayna. It's a stupid move for someone who wants to keep his family, and even if Lamar wins his baseball stadium, he still loses.

The proceedings seem to hang on Lamar's other daughter, Tandy (Judith Hoag), who has every reason to turn against Lamar after he promotes someone else over her. Tandy has had her share of problems with Rayna, but her immediate anger is at Lamar. So Teddy should have the upper hand, at least for now.

In other relationship news, "I'll Never Get Out of This World Alive" finds Gunnar (Sam Palladio) proposing to Scarlett (Clare Bowen). We don't see Scarlett's answer, but it's unlikely she'll say yes, or if she does, she won't go through with the nuptials. Scarlett and Gunnar's problems are too complicated to fix with a ring, and their careers are in drastically different places, Gunnar willing to give his up for her, which is the makings of resentment and more issues. They may very well end up together, but Nashville is a drama, and there's plenty of drama to milk out of both characters before allowing them to settle down.

Lastly, there's Will Lexington (Chris Carmack, The O.C.), the late addition to the cast. Will is trying to cover up his homosexuality because that could hurt him in his desire to be a country music star. Despite his only recently joining, we've learned enough about him to care, and although he isn't always on his best behavior, he doesn't deserve to be ruined. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, a plot that seems quite timely to the current social climate.

Nashville has proven itself to be a fine, compelling series, and this finale may be one of the best hours the show has delivered yet. I'm glad that it will be getting a second season beginning next fall on ABC.

Golden Globe's TV Categories Need Updating

Another awards season is upon us, with the Golden Globes just passed, and the Oscars approaching. There will be endless debates about people and films that are undeservedly left off of these lists. This column is not about that.

No, my complaint today is with the Golden Globes in particular, and the way that they treat television. Excellent hosts Tina Fey and Amy Poehler opened with a joke this year about how TV actors (like themselves) are looked at unfavorably compared to film performers (also, like themselves, though they are less known for film). In an era where the lines between the two have become increasingly blurred, this is an archaic notion, and one that should have been abandoned long ago, as television has moved into a golden age.

Also, it's quite funny that a film industry that thinks they are better than television airs their awards shows on the small screen, rather than making people go to the theater to witness the proceedings. Wouldn't that make more sense with the persistent attitude?

I'm not saying everything that graces the small screen is great, of course. But having moved through a decade that brought us Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Lost, Battlestar Galactica, The Wire, and The Sopranos, and being well into a decade with Homeland, Mad Men, The Walking Dead, Downton Abbey, Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Justified, and so many others, it is very hard to argue that television is an inferior medium.

I feel like the lack of understanding of television by an awards show that airs on, you guessed it, television, is best proven by a look at their categories.

First, the supporting actor and actress awards are separate from everything else because they do not get divided into two genres: drama or comedy. Well, three, because miniseries is rightly given its own standing. But for supporting players, they are all lumped in together. How do you possibly compare Sofia Vergara's work on Modern Family with Sarah Paulson in Game Change? You don't. You just reward the well respected Dame Maggie Smith, who is in a British miniseries, and ignore everyone else.

The main actor and actress, as well as the best program, are divided into three distinct genres, and they should be. Just as comedy movies are almost completely ignored by the Oscars, you won't catch the Golden Globes giving a supporting performance trophy to a sitcom star very often, if ever. It's completely unfair to put them together, even when effort is made to divide the nominations between all three arenas.

However, this separation has some trouble, too. Calling the comedy category "Comedy or Musical" comes from an era when all movie musicals were light-hearted, thus not belonging in the heavy drama world. That might work for Glee, but Smash and Nashville are every bit dramas, and should not be tossed in with the half hour situation comedies.

Those aside, you used to be able to tell if a series was a comedy or a drama simply by its running time. Dramas are typically hour-long shows, while comedies are half hours. But as HBO and Showtime have entered the arena with Nurse Jackie, The Big C, How To Make It In America, Weeds, and Enlightenment, this is no longer the case.

The problem becomes in how you define these types of series. I look at comedies as programs where the characters act a certain way to get a laugh, and the situations arise just to make the characters do funny things. If there are some jokes, but the main point of the story is an ongoing personal experience that fundamentally gets to the core of a person and forces them to look at themselves, not a humorous device, then it's a drama. I sometimes laugh at Nurse Jackie, but the show is about Jackie struggling with addiction and lies. This is not a comedy.

The Golden Globes haven't gotten wise to the shift, though. Which is probably why these types of series have come in and stolen the trophies from more traditional fare on the broadcast networks.

This year, Lena Dunham's win for Girls kind of throws a wrench into the entire thing. Her series is definitely drama, because serious things happen, and self-reflection is a large part of the story. Yet, Girls provides many more chuckles than its premium peers, and the arrogant, self-involved way in which Dunham's character behaves is inherently comedic. It's really, really hard to put this show in either box.

Which means that she won, of course, over actresses like Fey and Poehler who are following the comedy guidelines in the more traditional sense. Is this fair? Isn't what they are doing two completely different things?

The problem is, how can we solve this conundrum? The bloated Golden Globes is already too long, and diluting the field by adding more genres isn't doing anyone any favors. And yet, it certainly isn't fair that the smarter, bold, definition busting series take away from the broad comedies like 30 Rock and Community that still have something valuable to say, and can be outstanding examples of the art.
I do think we should move the HBO and Showtime series into the drama world. They may straddle the line, especially Girls, but the characters have more in common with broadcast dramas than comedies.

The fact that the Hollywood Foreign Press hasn't seen this, or chosen to do anything about it, just makes them feel out of touch with what really defines a genre. Considering that the purpose of the organization is to serve these programs, exhibiting such a glaring, fundamental fault takes away from their credibility greatly.

And then there's the argument that award shows themselves are dumb, at least for the viewing public, and should be private, industry-only events, and the number of them should be reduced drastically. I do actually agree with this argument, but that's a whole other column. Maybe next year.

Want to read some of my fiction? It's on my website, JeromeWetzel.com! Also, for the latest updates and article links, as well as commentary on episodes I don't fully review, please follow me on Twitter!

Article first published as Golden Globe's TV categories Need Updating on Blogcritics.

Welcome to Nashville

Grade: 92%

First there was FOX’s Glee. Then NBC’s Smash. Now ABC enters the musical fray, appealing to a different demographic, with NASHVILLE. While Glee mixes showtunes and pop, and Smash goes mostly for original, Broadway-style tunes, NASHVILLE embraces country, both old and new, with an interesting, soapy drama and some decent original music.

The leads are familiar to those the slightest bit familiar with the country music scene and recent films and television portrayals of it. Rayna James (Connie Britton, Friday Night Lights, American Horror Story) is a legend who is past her prime. Whereas before she sold out arenas, now ticket sales are dwindling. Her record label asks her to “co-headline,” really, open, for young sensation Juliette Barnes (Hayden Panettiere, Heroes). Rayna is insulted and refuses, even when record label threatens to drop her.

Is Rayna being unreasonable, a diva, if you will? Well, not completely. She acknowledges and apologizes for her diva moments. She just isn’t ready to admit she’s not as successful as some trampy young starlet who isn’t nearly as good as Rayna. Who can blame her for that?

It’s easy to stay sympathetic for Rayna because Juliette is a mess. Autotuned to correct a weak voice and freely trading carnal relations for favors, Juliette is a picture of everything that’s wrong with modern music and fame, country or otherwise. Even with a drug addict mother (Sylvia Jeffries, Eastbound & Down), thrown in to soften Juliette, it’s still hard to feel sorry for someone who so openly snubs Rayna and tries to steal Rayna’s band leader.

Said band leader, Deacon Claybourne (Charles Esten, Big Love, Enlightened), is the poor sob stuck in the middle. He is in love with Rayna, who is married to another man, and is offered sex and large amounts of money by Juliette to defect. A joint tour could save him the pain of having to choose, but with that looking unlikely by the end of the “Pilot,” he will probably be a source on conflict for the women.

Oh, and Rayna’s controlling and despicable father, Lamar Wyatt (Powers Boothe, Hatfields & McCoys, 24), is convincing her pushover husband, Teddy (Eric Close, Suits, Without a Trace), to run for mayor of Nashville, further complicating her life. This also sets the stage for a possible Deacon / Rayna romance if Teddy goes too far in service to Lamar.

The style of music will set NASHVILLE apart from its peers, but so, too, will the quality and tone. Whereas Smash and Glee might borrow from other sources, or use a limited catalogue, NASHVILLE freely explores different aspects of the genre. While the tunes are new and original for the series, it’s sort of like HBO’s Treme in that it uses the music to capture the spirit of an industry and a town. Whether it’s Juliette’s frothy popular fare, Rayna’s classics, or Scarlett’s (Clare Bowen) poetry that boyfriend Avery (Jonathan Jackson, General Hospital) turns into a new style entirely, there is a soul here that is missing from other television shows.

Add to that, NASHVILLE does the drama well. It’s not as over-the-top as Dallas, but there’s a Southern charm that can disguise snaky backstabbing that really gives flavor to the characters. There is no doubt that varying people have different agendas, and some are willing to be pretty unscrupulous to get what they want. There will be shades of grey, and while some of the villains are obvious, others will probably be created or revealed as the series unfolds, and several will probably straddle the line depending on the circumstances. These are fully developed people here, not just caricatures. Even setting the music aside, it’s a marvelously executed, engaging tale.

Which is why NASHVILLE deserves a watch. Some series can do one thing right, but few juggle multiple elements so deftly. A terrific cast, great music, and wonderful writing combine to make this one of the best new entries into the fall television season. The country aspect may be enough to appeal to many middle Americans, turned off by the specific genre that Glee and Smash fit into. And while it feels familiar enough to be welcome in our homes, it’s also different enough to feel like something new and special. Kudos all around.

NASHVILLE premieres this Wednesday, October 10th on ABC.